%@LANGUAGE="VBSCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%>
Characteristic study and potential customer requirement at remote area can be identified as follows:
Various technologies are available to provide basic telephone service to remote areas. The latest LEO and MEO systems, microwave technology and VSAT networks can be designed for specific existing infrastructure. The key is to integrate WLL technology and VSAT to offer rural and thin population areas viable communications networks. WLL coverage area The right WLL cell coverage area is very depended on open field and population distribution. Based on field experience, there are 9 WLL models. These models (table 1) illustrated rural environment at various types of continents, including forest, mountain, island, and flat land).
Table 1. Overview of rural customer density and topgraphy |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusion:
Choice of WLL/VSAT solutions Table 2 illustrates the comparison of standard WLL. Several characteristics of rural environments showed that standard DECT was the best choice if it used microcell technology. First, DECT microcell base station showed that it was suited with general medium population range (20 200 customers) for remote area. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 2. Comparison of standard WLL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Second, non-compressed DECT (32 kbit/s ADPCM) voice information speed showed several flexibilities for VSAT and for delivering good voice quality via satellite link. In addition to that, DECT terminals have a low data complexity and consumption. Therefore DECT terminal are designed to conduct fast distribution and to make low cost infrequent maintenance. The last one, low electrical power demand on DECT is suitable for the rural environment that has minimal infrastructure. VSAT technology selection is determined because of many demand similarities with standard WLL, as end user require lower rates and low intensity of telephone line use. Integration to lower costs The customers cost per line (under US$1,500) for low-density customer is viewed from WLL and VSAT devices integration to have mininal cost. The largest cost reduction were provided by:
Figure 1. Non-integrated DECT/VSAT component DECT Interface Unit (DIU base of integration attempts):
Figure 2. Integrated WLL/VSAT architecture This integration will save 50%. Figure 2 illustrated the network architecture. Its estimated that DIU-based terminal cost is under $1,000 per line for 180 customers population with low calling activity and generally under $1,500 for less than 50 customers with high calling activity. Computers and communicationsworlds
previously isolated from one anotherare converging and opening
up integrated mobility solutions (terminal devices, networks, applications).
In these terms, mobility pertains to terminal devices and users, free
choice of networks, transparency of services, and universally available
applications.
The focal points of DECT and GSM applications differ according to subscriber density and range .. |